Figures for the New Agreement

Looking back to 2014 and the conflict between Ukraine and Russia, the impact in the negotiations on Natural Gas between Russia and China:

- Russia is one of the major producers of natural gas of  the world, they provide China with their source of natural gas.

- Greece, Ukraine and Russia are three Catholic Ortodox countries in Europe.

- The Tithe of Russia is the most generous, due to their size and the Natural Gas company.

- There was a competition for the Russia's Tithe, from the churches of the European side of the country, to overpay Greece and Ukraine and to colaborate with the trade balance of the EU.

Thus, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, to decide the amount of the Ortodox Tithe should be of Eastern and Western Russia. The decision was made upon the amount of money for weapons Ukraine could purchase in a two-weeks basis, establishing therefore, the consume power of Ukraine. Due to heavy speculation in tourism, Greece didn't have to trench.


GDP Ukraine 112,2 bi USD --- stable after the conflict, 2014, due to the economy they dwelled on weapons at that time --- x
GDP Russia 1,578 tri USD --- earning profit sending weapons to the Middle East --- y
GDP China 12,24 tri  USD --- earning profit sending weapons to the Middle East --- z
GDP USA 19,39 tri USD --- earning profit producing weapons to the Middle East --- a



           
y + z   (13,818,000,000,000)

____________________________________ = 79.9576895307 = round to 80%

a       (19,390,000,000,000)               
_______

x       (112,000,000,000)



That calcullus made at in 2014 of weapons entering Ukraine in a 2 week basis allowed Russia to become the moderator that evaluates the amount of eapons entering the Middle East since.


This transaction gave profit margin to Russia, and consequently to China, who was investing in the purchases.


According to this calcullus, that shows the sum between two countries earning with the revenue on the weapons, fractioned by the division of two countries that have their economies' revenue affected with peaks and downs because of the commerce of weapons, says that the profit margin upon weapons sent to the Middle East must go down to 80%.


This value must be passed onto APEC, and APEC should invest in the BRICS for supplying the Middle East with stocks for Agribusiness, Cattle, Oil, Commodities and other needs for Consumption, Trade and Reconstruction of their cities. China is part of both Economic groups, thus the choice for APEC (BRICS is the supplier / Brazil esp.) The U.S. musn't fear losing money on the commerce of weapons decreasing, once they've been having mostly losses with the unpaid transactions and impossible Agreements (guns are not elements for Trade Agreements). The U.S. may earn a good profit margin with a bi-lateral Commercial Agreement that would benefit the USA with advantages and stocks.

China needs to pay higher taxes to Russia for the Natural Gas Company they are using, and Russia will provide the amount with the APEC. None of the countries will lose, due to the Commercial Agreement concerning the part of the oil and commodities stocks belonging to each, within the Trade in the BRICS.

Not only Brazil will provide goods within the New Trade Ageement. All countries must present their participation onto Middle East, North Korea and Eastern Europe needs.

The time rate that will set a target to the figure of 35% from the 80% decrease of weapons commercialized from the U.S., is the downfall of the price of the dollar in Argentina (currently 54.82 peso Argentinos). This economy should reach 13.5 pesos until the second semester of 2020.



Thank you for reading,


Thais Fernanda Ortiz de Moraes