Why do NYB sell cotton to India before and buy it from Africa to sell after?
If Africa sold to India first, then to NYB; then NYB sold to Brazil in order to sell to Europe, in a Trade Balance for grains, it would make more sense than giving all Asian and European market to ZCE, including all Russia. It is unbalanced somehow, something needs to approach.....hahahahahahaha
Supondo que dessa forma, o NYB continuaria sendo Israelense
I mean, in case that's how it rolls, I have no idea whatsoever.
In terms of stock.....
if
Africa sells to India?
India sells to NYB?
(......NYB buys Agro stocks from Brazil and NYB sell Agro to India)
NYB sells cotton to Brazil
Brazil sells cotton to Europe and Western Russia
Israel Trades cotton with Wales
NYB sells stocks (Agro) to Japan
Japan sells Agro stocks to China and Eastern Russia?
Japan buys cotton from NYB
ZCE sells cotton to countries in Asia and Eastern Russia
South Africa sells cotton to Brazil (stocks in the case, enclosing the BRICS)
And South Africa buys Agro from Brazil
THE MIDDLE EAST CONTINUES TO TRADE SILK WITH CHINA AND INDIA CONTINUES TO TRADE SATIN WITH CHINA AND JAPAN. THIS MARKET NEEDS A CLOSER LOOK, FOR SHARES BETWEEN PAKISTAN AND INDIA, ON TRADE OF SATIN (CONSIDERING CONFLICTS BETWEEN INDIA AND PAKISTAN)
As I learned from tv news yesterday, Cotton is alike "bitcoins", like a currency: the more a country has, more market they have to Trade. But it is not correct to inflate a country's economy with the production of cotton. There are Regulatory Authorities that decide whenever a country may be inserted into the Stocks and Trade, by allowing their initial cropping of cotton, as well as how much they can crop, and where exactly. When this insertion occurs, the other countries that seem interested at services and products provided by that "debutee" come forward.
LEARN ON HOW TO BECOME A CFDs TRADER (to trade on cotton): https://trading.info/cfd/
AND! What's news: cotton is really a matter of stocks, greater than the cropping itself. Africa is the most important producer of this product, but not the greater exporter (the stocks belong to NYB. Cotton stocks belonging to South America and Mercosur's also at NYB, as well as Gross Margin of Mercosur's Agrobusiness' and Commodities' stocks, that belong to that American stack). As their economy turns mostly 'round this good, they cannot have any other product which is value for money to Trade. It is like if they produced cash, or coins, and for that reason this wouldn't attach any value for them; otherwise, they would have to support the whole world in an unlimited production to suffice their own needs (if you produce money, and nothing else, you have to continue to produce for other people's supply; but if you produce money and you decide to spend it, that means corruption because you will always need more (for you, for the community, for the family, for the braggers, etc), and you must be entitled and allowed to generate more revenue (African diamonds, for instance). The solution for this problem is the creation and maintainance of sustainable NGOs and generating new jobs for the population through a Governamental moderator/organ, as well as a fair distribution of the magnate's fortune (or country's revenue) amongst society.
But please, don't play me a trick by saying that these figures of cotton represent the usage of nanotechnology....That would be a pity on the production of cotton buds!
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário