lab.bo

For Biblical reference, the men were perfect such as God in 

Paradise, the Eden Garden, but Eve decided to share her 

lovely dance of procreation with a so-called by the Gods, the 

"prohibited fruit", that is: she danced with an animal whose 

procreation was possible, but not allowed (or a Denisovan 

speciman for instance).

Eve then showed Adam that this type of procreation was 

possible and he was tempted.

Upon an illegitimate pregnancy of Eve, the place within the 

Paradise wasn't accordingly to Adam and Eve.

They were sent to the Earth and their offspring became raw as 

Neandertal.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?

v=lnFGvs6SnCE&list=PLN4Uo7gdvAc1hVflLMMETLPtsIc6vQz9a

Once placed on Earth, the Neandertal, now an extinct 

specimen, may have crossed with Denisovan, resulting in the 

"Donny" (the first-generation hybrid hominin) 

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2177634-prehistoric-

girl-had-parents-belonging-to-different-human-species/ ), I 

don't think such discoveries would fit humanity for 

experiments such as crossing between humans and the Apes, I am 

agressively against it. And I believe that so are the Siemens

themselves, once they might feel they want to be respected 

for their own race, and they too, in the uttermost of their 

intellect, which has been developed since the 1960's through 

game programming for them to unroll, I deffend and support 

the position that Apes do feel that if they were crossed 

with humans they would be watched not as 'Chewbaccas' rather 

as 'aberrations', fiercely misjudged or prejudiced. Why not - find a 

way to ask the Apes about how they feel, not for a human crossed 

pregnancy, but for a possibly lab-crossed-embrio-homo-siemens baby.

I am against. How do you think that the Apes (Siemens) feel about it?